Engage
Dedicated Squads
A full engineering team, owned and accountable
When the bottleneck is capacity, we bring an entire team — engineers, QA and delivery management — and take ownership of shipping. Our largest squad runs more than twelve engineers across five product surfaces, with another team of eight on a separate client platform.
We have run this model in three different situations: taking over a platform whose delivery had stalled, building out a healthcare product from a standing start, and running squads across a multi-product portfolio where the same team shipped a messaging platform and a set of AI products under one owner. The shape changes, the accountability does not.
That is the distinction that matters. We are not filling seats against your backlog and waiting for direction. We own architecture, release cadence and quality, and we report on outcomes — so your founders can stay on customers and fundraising instead of triaging engineering every morning.
You probably need this if
- Delivery is the constraint on the business, not demand or funding
- Hiring cannot move fast enough for the window you are in
- Several product surfaces need to move at once and one team cannot cover them
- Your senior people spend more time coordinating contractors than building
- Quality is slipping because nobody owns the release process
What a squad actually includes
A squad is a working unit, not a pile of individual contractors. It comes with a senior lead who owns architecture and technical decisions, engineers across the surfaces in scope, QA, and delivery management running scrum, stories and reporting.
That last part is normally where agency engagements quietly fail. Delivery process gets treated as the client's job, so nobody is accountable for whether the work actually lands. We include it, because a team without delivery ownership is just a more expensive way to have the same bottleneck.
- Senior lead owning architecture, standards and release cadence
- Engineers sized to the surfaces in scope, not to a fixed template
- QA inside the team so quality is not a phase at the end
- Scrum, stories, estimates and delivery reporting included as standard
Embed, stabilize, accelerate
We do not open with a rewrite proposal. The first weeks are spent getting genuinely productive inside your codebase and understanding why delivery is slow, which is frequently a process problem wearing a technical costume.
Then we stabilize whatever is actively costing you — flaky releases, broken environments, the module everyone is afraid to touch. Only after that do we accelerate feature work, because velocity on an unstable base is just a faster way to create incidents.
- Weeks one to two: into the codebase, shipping small real changes
- Weeks three to six: stabilize releases, environments and the risky areas
- From there: sustained feature delivery on a predictable cadence
- Throughout: written decisions so context does not live only in our heads
How we work with your existing team
Most squads run alongside in-house engineers, and the failure mode there is two parallel teams with separate standards and quiet resentment. We avoid it by joining your process rather than running our own beside it — your repository, your review standards, shared standups.
Where you have no in-house engineering yet, we operate as the engineering function until you do, and we build with the explicit assumption that you will hire. That means documentation and conventions aimed at the developer who has not been hired yet.
Squads across a portfolio
Some of our squad work is not one product but several. Where a single owner runs a portfolio, we have staffed teams across a messaging platform and a group of AI products at the same time, with shared standards and people moving between products as priorities shift.
That arrangement only works if conventions, review standards and delivery process are genuinely shared rather than nominally shared. It is more setup work at the start, and it means a new product in the portfolio starts with a team that already knows how you build.
- Shared engineering standards and review process across products
- People reallocated between products as priorities change, without re-onboarding
- One delivery rhythm and one reporting view across the portfolio
Timezones and overlap
We have deployed engineers across six continents and treat overlap as a design decision rather than something to apologise for. Clients in the United States, Australia, Europe and Southeast Asia all run on scheduled daily overlap with their squad.
Async is used where it genuinely works — written decisions, recorded context, detailed pull requests — and live hours are reserved for the things that need them.
How the work runs
Scoping conversation
What is actually blocking delivery, which surfaces matter, and what the next two quarters need to look like. We will tell you if a squad is the wrong shape for your problem.
Team assembly
Two to three weeks to stand up a squad matched to the stack and the surfaces, led by someone who has shipped something comparable.
Embed and stabilize
Into your repository and process, shipping real changes early, then stabilizing the parts actively costing you time.
Sustained delivery
Predictable cadence with delivery reporting, scaling the team up or down as the roadmap changes.
What you get
- —Dedicated engineering team with named senior technical ownership
- —Delivery process — scrum, stories, estimates and reporting
- —QA coverage inside the team rather than as an afterthought
- —Written architecture decisions and onboarding documentation
- —A predictable release cadence your business can plan around
What we will not do
- —We do not bill a discovery phase before engineers are shipping
- —We will not staff a squad larger than the problem needs
- —Code, infrastructure and accounts remain yours throughout
Where we have done this
Common questions
How quickly can a squad start?
Typically two to three weeks to assemble and embed a full team. A solo senior can usually start sooner if you need momentum immediately while the squad forms.
Can we scale the team down later?
Yes. Engagements are ongoing rather than locked into long fixed contracts. If scope shrinks the team shrinks, and handover documentation is part of the work rather than an exit negotiation.
Who manages the team day to day?
We do. Delivery management comes with the squad, and you get reporting and a direct line to the technical lead rather than an account manager relaying messages.
What happens to knowledge if we part ways?
It is documented as we go, in your repository. We build so your team is never dependent on us to keep shipping — that is a condition of doing this well, not a favour.
Need this on your product?
Tell us where delivery is stuck. We will give you an honest read on scope and shape before anyone talks contracts.
Book a technical reviewOther ways to engage